Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT TASPEN Jakarta Pusat

Idah Yuniasih

Idah Yuniasih Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Abstract

Today's business industry competition makes many companies are required to increase and improve company performance. Every company must improve the factors that can improve employee performance so that each company has the ability to improve its performance. The factor that influences the performance results of one of the existing work motivations is the result of an assessment of the results of a particular task. The results of the study indicate that work motivation is applied well to the Employee's Performance. This can be proven from the results of the calculation of the verified coefficient r = 0.431 on Sig. (2 tailed) of 0.002 by using a significance level of 5%, it is significant with the Sig. (2 tailed) is smaller than 0.05. The coefficient of determination test can be an average value of R square 0.186 or 18.6% meaning that Employee Performance is expected by Work Motivation by 18.6% and the remaining 81.4% is needed by other factors which is not supported. Regression coefficient of 0.370 is announced every time (because it is positive) 1 time for Work Motivation will increase Employee Performance by 0.370.

Keywords: Motivation, Employee Performance

References

Afni, N. (2016). PENGUKURAN PENILAIAN KINERJA KARYAWAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ADAPTIVE NEURO FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM ( ANFIS ). (2), 140–152.

Arif, Sukuryadi, & Fatimaturrahmi. (2017). yang di peroleh dalam penelitian ini adalah 0,467, sedangkan nilai r. 1(2), 108–116.

Busro, D. M. (2018). Teori-teori Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (1st ed.; D. M. Busro, ed.). Jakarta: Pranadamedia Group.

Hamali, A. Y. (2018). Pemahaman Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (2nd ed.; A.
Y. Hamali, ed.). Jakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).

Kurniasari, R. (2016). MOTIVASI KERJA PADA KARYAWAN PT KAI COMMUTER JABODETABEK. VIII(2), 156–163.

Lestari, I. T. D., & Djaelani, A. K. (2019). Prodi manajemen. 66–80.

M. T, B., & Daryanto. (2017). Manajemen Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan (1st ed., Vol. 214; M. T. Drs. Bintaro & D. Daryanto, eds.). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gava Media.

Mulyadi, D., & Syafitri, A. (2015). Pengaruh kepemimpinan dan motivasi kerjfile:///D:/Irin Line/materi kampus/TA/jurnal buat TA/jurnal 18.pdfa terhadap kinerja karyawan di bank bjb syariah cabang bogor. 11(2), 33–38.

Prihastuti, E. S. (2018). Pengaruh motivasi dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai kantor dinas pengendalian penduduk dan keluarga berencana kota bandar lampung (penelitian).

Sidanti, H. (2015). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja, disiplin kerja dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai negeri sipil di sekretariat dprd kabupaten madiun. 9, 44–53.

Silalahi, S. C., & Simalango, Ansari Grace, D. (2019). 1 , 2 , 3 , 4. 3(1), 81–94. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian administrasi (A. Nuryanto, ed.). Bandung:
ALFABETA.

Uno, D. H. H. B. (2016). Teori Motivasi & Pengukurannya (14th ed.; D. H. H. B. Uno, ed.). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Yudha, D., Jaelani, A. Q., & Rachmat, A. (2019). Pengaruh Kompensasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Koperasi Unit Desa Pakis Kabupaten Malang. 186–199.